Editorial policy

We aim to publish original, accurate and useful technology articles. AI is used to prepare drafts, organize material and clarify complex information; responsibility for the published material remains with human editors.

1. Research standards

Prefer official documentation, standards bodies, manufacturer specifications, and credible independent testing. Verify important technical claims against sources appropriate to the topic. Record uncertainty when evidence is incomplete.

2. Product reviews and comparisons

We must never imply we tested products, measured performance, visited facilities or interviewed people when we have not. Research-based evaluations will be labeled accordingly. Product-specific benchmarks must be attributed to a verifiable source or omitted.

3. Publication approval

Every AI draft passes human review for factual accuracy, clarity, accessible markup, source quality, internal links and conflicts of interest. Pages remain unpublished until explicit approval is given.

4. Affiliate independence

Financial relationships must be disclosed. Recommendations should reflect the visitor's needs and product suitability, not merely commission rates. Affiliate links will be marked as sponsored when added.

5. Corrections and updates

Material errors should be corrected promptly. Publication and modification dates should reflect actual editorial activity. A correction note should be added when a significant published claim changes.

6. AI disclosure

The site will tell readers that AI assists with content production and that a human editor approves published work. We will not create imaginary authors or qualifications.